Congress is full of ID-10t’s
Let’s sit down for a minute.
Forget Democrats. Forget Republicans.
Forget red states, blue states, left, right, MAGA, progressive, conservative, liberal, libertarian, independent and whatever political flavor of the week we’ve invented since breakfast.
I want to talk about something I think almost everyone can agree on:
Our government has become absolutely fucking ridiculous.
And before somebody gets their political underwear in a bind, I’m not talking about one party.
I’m talking about the entire damn circus. Watch five minutes of a congressional hearing.
Just five.
Watch grown adults, elected to represent hundreds of thousands or millions of Americans, interrupt each other, insult each other, belittle each other, grandstand for the cameras and act like middle-schoolers fighting over whose turn it is to use the basketball.
This is supposed to be the most powerful legislative body on Earth.
And sometimes it looks less like Congress and more like a Jerry Springer episode.
We elect these people to solve problems.
Instead, they spend an extraordinary amount of time arguing about whose problem is more important, who gets credit for fixing it and who can blame the other side when nothing gets fixed.
And then we wonder why Americans are pissed off.
Meanwhile, Back in the Real World…
Let’s look at something particularly entertaining:
Things that are legal.
Alcohol? Legal. Tobacco? Legal. Firearms? Legal.
Cannabis? Well…
Apparently we need a flowchart.
Alcohol is an intoxicating substance that can cause addiction, impaired driving, liver disease, cardiovascular problems, cancer and an enormous amount of social harm.
And yet we have an entire industry built around producing it, selling it, taxing it and consuming it.
Nobody walks into a liquor store and says:
“I’m sorry, sir. Before I sell you this bottle of bourbon, I need to determine whether you have a qualifying medical condition.”
Or better yet…
“I’m sorry sir, can you fill this form out, and if your beat your wife or kids, I cannot sell this rum to you”
No.
You show your ID. You pay your money. You leave.
Simple. Tobacco? Same basic idea.
We know what cigarettes can do to people. The government knows. The manufacturers know.
Consumers know. It’s legal, regulated, taxed and sold.
Firearms? Also legal.
But we’ve built an enormous regulatory framework around them.
Federal Firearms Licensees have to navigate federal regulations, recordkeeping requirements, background checks and an ever-changing collection of rules and procedures.
And then there’s the National Firearms Act world.
Suppressors are a perfect example. A suppressor isn’t some magical James Bond murder tube.
It’s an accessory designed to reduce the sound and muzzle blast of a firearm.
And for decades, the federal government treated acquiring one like you were applying for permission to launch a nuclear submarine.
Now, to be fair, the law has changed. The federal tax on most NFA firearms, including suppressors, was reduced to $0 in 2026. The ATF still maintains the registration and approval framework, however. ATF’s NFA tax information
And that’s my point.
Why does everything have to be so damn complicated?
Why does the person who is already willing to follow the law have to navigate the maze?
And Then There’s Question 21(e)
Here’s another little gem.
Walk into a federally licensed gun store and fill out an ATF Form 4473.
Question 21(e) asks whether you’re an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or another controlled substance.
The ATF specifically warns that marijuana remains illegal under federal law even if your state has legalized it for medical or recreational use. ATF Form 4473
So think about the contradiction.
Your state can say: “Medical cannabis is legal.”
Federal law can simultaneously say: “Marijuana is federally illegal.”
And federal firearms law can then potentially say: “If you’re an unlawful user, you may be prohibited from possessing a firearm.”
I’m not arguing that someone should handle a firearm while impaired.
Of course not. I’m asking a much simpler question:
Why are we creating laws that treat a lawful state medical-cannabis patient fundamentally differently from someone who legally consumes alcohol?
If the concern is impairment, regulate impairment.
If the concern is addiction, address addiction.
If the concern is criminal behavior, punish criminal behavior.
But if someone is otherwise a law-abiding citizen, why should the government’s answer depend on whether their legally permitted intoxicant came in a bottle or came from a plant?
That’s not a question about Democrats or Republicans.
That’s a question about whether our laws actually make sense together.
Now Let’s Talk Cannabis
Here’s where things get really interesting.
Cannabis. Medical cannabis. Recreational cannabis. Hemp-derived THC. Delta-8. Delta-9. THCA. CBD.
Different names. Different laws. Different states. Different regulations. Different interpretations.
Same damn plant.
Now, I’m not suggesting cannabis has zero risks.
It doesn’t. Neither does alcohol. Neither does tobacco. Neither do prescription medications.
Hell, Tylenol can kill you if you abuse it.
The question isn’t whether something has risk. The question should be:
What is a rational way to regulate that risk?
Because right now? Rational isn’t exactly the word that comes to mind.
Medical Marijuana vs. Recreational Marijuana
In West Virginia, medical cannabis is legal under a regulated state program.
A patient has to meet the state’s requirements, obtain certification, get an identification card and purchase through the regulated system.
And here’s where the average person starts scratching their head.
The plant doesn’t magically transform into a different plant because you have a medical card.
THC doesn’t look at your driver’s license and say: “Oh shit, he’s a patient. Better change molecular structure.”
It’s still cannabis. The difference is the legal framework surrounding its use.
And that brings us to the current federal insanity.
The Farm Bill That Isn’t Really Just About Farms
The 2018 Farm Bill created the federal distinction between hemp and marijuana based on a 0.3% delta-9 THC threshold.
And somebody eventually realized:
“Wait a minute… We can make intoxicating products from hemp while staying within the language of the law.”
And the hemp-derived cannabinoid industry exploded.
Now Congress wants to change the rules.
Beginning November 12, 2026, the federal definition of hemp changes dramatically.
Instead of looking only at delta-9 THC, the new law uses total THC, including THCA, and it excludes certain synthesized cannabinoids and imposes a 0.4 milligram per-container limit on certain finished hemp-derived cannabinoid products.
Read that again. 0.4 milligrams.
That’s not a typo. And that could have enormous consequences for the hemp-derived THC products currently sitting on shelves across America.
Including beverages. Including products consumers can currently purchase legally in many states.
The government isn’t simply saying: “Let’s regulate these products.”
It’s potentially redefining a huge portion of the existing market right out of the legal definition of hemp.
And here’s the kicker:
Congress still hasn’t gotten its own damn house in order.
The Senate Agriculture Committee attempted to advance the 2026 Farm Bill on August 6.
It failed. The vote was 10–11.
Democrats objected primarily over provisions involving SNAP and state responsibility for food-assistance costs, while Republicans argued that continued delay was hurting farmers and rural communities.
So while Americans are trying to figure out what the hell they’re going to be allowed to buy in November…
Congress is arguing with Congress.
Again.
And This Is Where I Start Getting Pissed Off
I’m not asking the government to disappear. I’m asking it to make fucking sense.
If cannabis is dangerous enough that it needs regulation?
Fine. Regulate it.
If THC beverages need age restrictions?
Fine. Require ID.
If manufacturers need laboratory testing?
Fine. Test the products.
If products need accurate dosage information?
Absolutely. Put the milligrams on the damn label.
If manufacturers need to meet safety and manufacturing standards?
Great. Establish them.
If driving while impaired is dangerous? Punish impaired driving.
If selling intoxicating products to children is dangerous? Make that illegal.
But build a regulatory system that actually reflects the product you’re regulating.
Don’t create a legal gray area, allow an industry to develop, let millions of consumers purchase the products, let legitimate businesses sell them, collect the taxes… and then suddenly decide:
“Well, actually, we don’t like this anymore.”
That’s not governance. That’s legislative whiplash.
And businesses are the ones left holding the bag.
Here’s My Biggest Problem With All of This
The people who follow the rules are the easiest people in America to regulate.
Think about that. The guy who owns the restaurant?
Easy to regulate.
Health inspections. Liquor licenses. Payroll taxes. Sales tax. Workers’ compensation. Insurance. Food safety. Business licenses. Fire inspections.
You name it. The guy who owns a gun shop? Easy to regulate.
The farmer? Easy to regulate.
The licensed cannabis business? Easy to regulate.
The tobacco retailer? Easy to regulate.
The liquor store? Easy to regulate.
Because we know where they are.
We know their names.
We know their businesses.
We know their addresses.
We know what they’re selling.
We know they’re trying to stay legal.
And we know they’ll answer the phone when the government calls.
Meanwhile…
Criminals don’t give a shit.
They don’t file the paperwork. They don’t apply for the permit. They don’t submit the background check. They don’t pay the licensing fee. They don’t wait for approval. They don’t hire an attorney to interpret the latest regulatory change. They don’t sit through a three-hour compliance seminar.
They just… sell the shit.
That’s the uncomfortable part nobody wants to talk about.
Every time government makes the legal pathway harder, more expensive, more confusing and more restrictive, it creates an opportunity for the illegal market.
And then government responds to the illegal market by creating more regulations for the legal market.
It’s a beautiful little circle. A bureaucratic ouroboros.
We’re regulating ourselves into oblivion while the people we’re supposedly trying to stop are standing outside the regulatory fence laughing their asses off.
Maybe We’re Asking the Wrong Question
Instead of: “How do we stop people from having this?”
Maybe we should be asking: “How do we make the legal option safer, simpler and more attractive than the illegal option?”
That’s how you win.
Make legal products:
- Tested.
- Labeled.
- Age restricted.
- Taxed reasonably.
- Manufactured safely.
- Sold by legitimate businesses.
- Easy to understand.
- Easy to regulate.
And then go after the people actually committing crimes.
Hmmm? Common sense actually makes sense!
At least I think it does.
Maybe it’s buried somewhere in the Congressional basement next to the bipartisan cooperation.
And Before Someone Says It…
No. I’m not advocating that people start buying illegal guns.
I’m not telling people to start buying drugs from the lady living behind Mugsy’s.
I’m not suggesting we all return to the glory days of back-alley bootlegging.
Although, judging by the way things are going, I’m starting to understand why bootlegging existed in the first place.
When government makes the legal path ridiculous enough, eventually people stop asking:
“What are the rules?”
And start asking:
“Why the hell am I following them?”
That’s a dangerous place for a government to push its citizens.
Because laws only work when people believe the laws are legitimate, rational and worth following.
You cannot regulate your way into respect. You have to earn it.
We The People
This isn’t about Democrats. It isn’t about Republicans.
It isn’t about Trump. Or any other president.
It isn’t about marijuana. It isn’t about guns. It isn’t about alcohol. It isn’t about tobacco.
Those are merely the examples.
The real problem is the machine.
A government that takes forever to solve problems.
A government that can’t seem to agree on basic legislation.
A government where politicians spend more time attacking each other than solving problems.
A government that creates regulations nobody understands.
A government that changes those regulations before businesses have figured out the last ones.
A government that makes the honest citizen jump through hoops while criminals ignore the hoops entirely.
And then everybody wonders why Americans are becoming increasingly cynical.
We’re not stupid. We’re watching. We’re paying attention. We’re paying the taxes. We’re filling out the forms. We’re getting the licenses. We’re standing in line. We’re waiting for approvals. We’re following the rules.
And eventually, somebody is going to look around and ask the question that I think millions of Americans are already asking:
“When did doing everything right become the hardest damn option?”
Maybe that’s the conversation we should be having.
Not left versus right. Not red versus blue. Not Democrat versus Republican.
Government versus common sense.
Because if the people who follow the law are continually punished with more cost, more paperwork, more restrictions and more uncertainty… while the people who break the law simply ignore everything…
we shouldn’t be shocked when people lose faith in the system.
We should be asking ourselves why we built a system that makes them want to.
Maybe the problem isn’t that Americans don’t respect the law anymore.
Maybe the problem is that our government has forgotten what the law is supposed to accomplish in the first place.
And that, my friends… is one hell of a thought.